Everything SnapLine does through its interface, it can do headless. The submission API accepts raw broker documents and returns structured, validated, enriched submission data — straight into your policy administration system, pricing models, underwriting workbench, or data warehouse.
Some teams want underwriters working in SnapLine’s interface from day one. Others want submission intelligence flowing invisibly into systems they already use. SnapLine supports both: the interface and the API are the same platform, so a team can start in the UI and move to headless integration — or run both in parallel — without re-implementation.
Structured submission records with per-field confidence scores; document classification and provenance; cross-document validation flags; and per-location enrichment including hazard profiles, valuation adequacy against modelled rebuild cost, and vacancy indicators. Delivery into policy admin, pricing, workbenches and data warehouses is part of the design-partner integration work.
| Build in-house | SnapLine | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to production | 12–24 months of engineering | Weeks, with design-partner support |
| Insurance document coverage | Built format by format | MRC, ACORD, schedules, packs from day one |
| Enrichment data | Separate licensing and plumbing | Included, plus bring-your-own providers |
| Ongoing accuracy | Your team maintains it | Continuous QC checks by SnapLine |
Yes — documents in, structured enriched data out, with no requirement for underwriters to use the SnapLine interface.
Policy administration systems, pricing models, underwriting workbenches and data warehouses — integration is configured with your team as part of onboarding.
Yes — client-licensed risk data plugs into the same enrichment pipeline, so API responses reflect your full data stack.
Three of your own submissions, processed free — no sales call, no credit card, no integration.
Try the Demo